Infrastructure September 7, 2026 mixed ⇧ 258 pts across 2 threads

Governments and Enterprises Defecting from Microsoft and VMware

Switzerland's federal government is migrating 3,000 computers off Microsoft to Linux-based alternatives, and Tottenham Hotspur FC reported an 85% reduction in licensing fees after migrating off VMware. Both stories landed on the same day, which is a coincidence, but the underlying driver is identical: Broadcom's acquisition of VMware pushed enterprise licensing costs high enough to make the migration math work, and Microsoft's licensing model is drawing the same scrutiny in public sector contexts.

Commenters on the Switzerland story noted that the real risk for Microsoft is not Switzerland itself but the demonstration effect. When organizations take the plunge and see a well-supported Linux distro, some of their users won't want to go back. The VMware story drew skepticism about the 85% reduction headline (without knowing baseline spend, the number is meaningless), but the directional signal is consistent with what the broader market is reporting.

The Tottenham story also drew a sharp comment: 'There is a 100% chance someone in Broadcom exec is making money shorting themselves,' which captures the HN read on Broadcom's strategy. The bet seems to be: extract maximum value from the installed base before customers escape, and use the resulting cash for something else.


So what?

If you sell infrastructure tooling or services, the VMware exodus is a genuine and sustained sales opportunity. Enterprises are actively looking for alternatives and have budget allocated for migration. For founders building in this space, the Switzerland story is useful proof that public sector mandates can create large, stable contracts around open-source-based solutions.

Read these