Domain registrars keep punishing users without warning
Two threads hit the same nerve today. A .name TLD user discovered their domain was being terminated because of a policy enforcement action they didn't know existed and had no ability to contest. Separately, an older but still-active thread about Namecheap terminating Russian accounts without notice resurfaced, with users describing scrambling to move infrastructure mid-crisis.
The pattern: registrars and DNS infrastructure operators are making unilateral decisions that cascade immediately into broken email, failed authentication, and downed services, with no meaningful appeal process and minimal notice. The .name thread specifically called out that changes like this should require a public comment period, similar to city planning rules. Nobody disagrees with that in theory. It doesn't happen in practice.
This is a specific instance of a broader infrastructure trust problem. Founders who treat domain registration as a solved, boring, set-and-forget problem are one Verisign policy change away from a crisis.
So what?
Use a registrar with a clear, written policy on termination and a real support escalation path. Keep backups of DNS records and monitor for changes. If you're on a novelty TLD, understand that the registry itself is a counterparty risk, not just the registrar. .com is boring for a reason.