Cricut and the Locked Hardware Problem
A thread on unlocking a deactivated Cricut Maker drew a flood of comments from people who regret buying the machine. The Cricut ecosystem requires a cloud connection for most features, and the company has a history of retroactively changing terms to require subscriptions for functionality that previously didn't need them. The hack in question gets the unit working again inside the Cricut ecosystem, which commenters note just delays the next deactivation.
The broader pattern here connects to the Sectorforth and Unsloth threads in a different way: there's a strong appetite on HN for ownership and control over tools, both hardware and software. The Cricut situation is a textbook case of a company using software lockout to monetize hardware that users thought they owned outright.
This isn't new, but the secondhand market consequences are real. Resale stores are filling up with deactivated Cricuts that are worthless to most buyers, which is a predictable outcome when hardware depends on a company's continued goodwill to function.
So what?
If you're building a hardware product with a software dependency, the Cricut situation is a cautionary tale about how aggressively you can change terms post-sale. Users who feel burned will warn everyone they know, and the secondhand market tells the honest story about how much people trust your product long-term. Right-to-repair sentiment is strong enough now that hostile software lockout is a reputational liability.