Accenture Buys Ookla: Builders See Easy Arbitrage
Accenture announced it is acquiring Ookla, the company behind Speedtest.net. The HN reaction is almost uniformly skeptical of the price: multiple commenters argue the core technology could be rebuilt for $20M or less, and that the acquisition price reflects brand recognition and data assets, not engineering complexity. One commenter was inspired enough to say they might just go build a competitor.
The key insight here is that the HN community is identifying a recurring pattern: large acquirers pay for distribution and brand, not code. Ookla has run millions of tests and has ISP relationships, which is the actual asset. The code is the least interesting part.
This mirrors a broader frustration builders express when incumbents with simple technology command large valuations. The flip side is that this is exactly the playbook: build a simple tool, get ubiquitous distribution, and the acquirer pays for the network, not the lines of code.
So what?
If you are building in a space where the technology is genuinely replicable but your distribution and data are not, lean into that asymmetry in how you pitch and grow. Accenture did not buy a codebase; it bought a measurement network. Your moat needs to be similarly hard to replicate even if your tech is not.