Agent harnesses are getting swapped like text editors
The "Goodbye Claude, Hello Pi" post describes leaving Claude Code for the Pi harness, and the author says Anthropic announced AGENTS.md support a day after the decision. Commenters say the AGENTS vs CLAUDE.md split was always going to collapse. One person runs nightly local-model tests and reports that opencode beats ohmypi on code benchmark tasks. In the older Anthropic thread (47633396), subscribers were complaining that Claude Code subscriptions could no longer power third-party tools like OpenClaw. The grievances were rate limits hitting within 1:45 on afternoons and "when you fully use the capacity you paid for, that's too much."
The pattern: the model is no longer the sticky part. Instructions, skills and memory files are becoming portable text, and the harness is a thin, replaceable layer. The agent-memory thread backs this up. Commenters call memory "strictly harmful" because it fixates on the wrong things, and ask why agents that read plain text need a new spec at all.
The counterpoint is that vendors can still win on pricing and usage policy. When Anthropic limits what a subscription can do, users start comparing alternatives immediately.
So what?
If you build on one vendor's agent tooling, assume your users can leave in an afternoon. Stick to open conventions like AGENTS.md and plain-file config, and don't count on a proprietary memory or config format as a moat.