Model prices collapse as open weights go on-prem
OpenAI and Anthropic cut LLM prices by up to 80% within a few months, and the top comment predicts token vendors will end up like mobile data providers: more throughput, more efficiency, thin margins. One commenter said their team tried Kimi and GLM after hitting 'cybersecurity' blocks on the big two and found them much cheaper. IBM's CEO then said open-weight models are now good and cheap enough to run on-prem. Commenters immediately noted IBM sells the hardware, and asked everyone to stop giving weight to CEOs talking their book.
The 'Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model' thread shows how close this is. One user says Qwen 3.6 27B dense is about equal to Haiku 4.5. Another runs DeepSeek V4 Flash on two RTX Pro 6000 Blackwells at 160 tok/s. A third tried Gemma 4 on an M4 and found tok/s far below the cloud. The gap is shrinking but is not gone. Separately, the thread on Anthropic ending Claude Code subscription use with OpenClaw shows the labs tightening access even as prices fall.
The counterpoint: 'good enough for the old world' is not the same as good enough for what's coming. Frontier labs may be cutting prices by shipping cheaper models behind the same names, which is one commenter's explanation.
So what?
Don't build a business whose margin depends on one vendor's token price or one vendor's subscription rules. Design your stack so you can swap models, and test an open-weight option now, because your costs and your customers' security requirements are both pushing that way.
Read these
OpenAI and Anthropic cut their LLM prices by up to 80% within a few months. Why?
IBM CEO says open weight models are now good and cheap on-prem
Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw